вторник, 12 февраля 2019 г.

Criticism of the Dirac monopole



V.S. Leonov
The problem of the magnetic monopole was tackled by Dirac as an independent magnetic charge and in his honor it is referred to as the Dirac monopole. Naturally, the search for magnetic monopoles and attempts to detect mass in them resulted in the experimental boom in the 60s which, however, has not yielded positive results. The Dirac monopoles have not been detected The interest in them has been renewed because of the quantization of space-time in the EQM. theory which regards the magnetic monopole as a non-free particle bonded in space-time and this particle cannot be detected in the free state. Only the indirect registration of the manifestation of the properties of magnetic monopoles in disruption of the magnetic equilibrium of the space-time in accordance with the Maxwell equations is possible.

The fact that the role of magnetic monopoles in the structure of the space-time was not understood prevented for a very long period of time the development of a method of determination of the value of the charge g of the magnetic monopole. Dirac himself assumed that taking into account the un ambiguity of the phase of the wave function of the electron intersecting the line of n-nodes consisting of magnetic poles, we obtain the required relationship:
g = 68.5e [C]
Here e = 1.6·10(–19) C is the electron charge.

The Dirac relationship (2.2) was improved by the well-known American theoretical physicist J. Schwinger who proved that n in equation (2) should only be an even number, and at n = 2 we obtain g = 137 e .

However, the Dirac method is indirect in which a line of nodes can be separated in space from the magnetic charge included in the space-time structure. In reality, in the quantized only a line of quantons can be separated in the form of an alternating string from magnetic and electrical dipoles. In particular, Dirac did not take into account the electrical component of the effect. In movement of an electron along such an alternating string, the electron is subjected to the effect of waves from the side of the space-time which is characterized by the constant fine structure α. This was also taken into account nonformally by Schwinger by introducing n = 2.

It would appear that there is no basis for doubting Dirac’s method which has been accepted by physicists and is regarded as a classic method. From the mathematical viewpoint, the Dirac solutions are accurate. However, from the viewpoint of physics, the Dirac procedure contradicts not only the structure of the quantized space-time but also the solutions of the Maxwell equations for the electromagnetic field in vacuum.
The correct formula for a magnetic charge was first obtained by the Russian physicist Leonov in the theory of Superunification in 1996:
g = Ce = 4.8·10(–11) [L]
Here [L] = [Leon]= [Am]
C – light speed.
Read more:
1. Unit of measurement of magnetic charge - Leon
2. Download free. Leonov V. S. Quantum Energetics. Volume 1. Theory of Superunification, 2010.

понедельник, 11 февраля 2019 г.

Unit of measurement of magnetic charge - Leon




© V.S. Leonov


I discovered insolent plagiarism on the Internet from my theory of Superunification. Plagiarism was associated with my formula for magnetic charge. Therefore, I decided to name the unit of measurement of an elementary magnetic charge g in Leon by the name of the author:
1 Am = 1 Leon [L]
g = Coe = 4.8.10–11 Am = 4.8.10–11 Leon (L)                    (1)
Сo light speed, 
e = 1.6.10–19 C – elementary electric charge.

Full text PDF in Russian, see Google Drive on the following link: